Law/Warrant

IHOW TO MAKE A WARRANT/LAW.. Like the difference between "those who can't read and those who don't read" ("Nothing", Mark Twain)... Or the fact that "PENUCILLIN NEVER CURED ANYONE WHO DIDN'T TAKE ANY" ("Enemy Doctors", COVID-19 EPIDEMIC)....America's problem is not that "We're racist, sexist, homophobes, or 'just don't have the transparent government' we need"....It's that "WITHOUT PROPER GRAND JURY FUNCTION (AND PROPER JURYLESS/IN-SOLIDO COURT FUNCTION), WE HAVE 'NO GOVERNMENT' [NEEDED TO MAKE THE VERDICTS/WARRANTS/LAWS WE REQUIRE TO LIVE], INSTEAD WE HAVE ONLY AN EVER WORSENING RACKET", CREATED AND PAID TO BE SUCH A "TRUE GOVERNMENT"...BUT, without the "properly functioning government/grand-or-trial-juries/properly-functioning-in-solido-courts" needed to correct our current malfunctions ...And our Grand Juries don't work...Or, perhaps I should, more correctly say, since the Founding Fathers made our government "EFFECTIVELY MALFUNCTION PROOF" (TO THE "WARRANT LEVEL OR STAGE", ANYWAY...THAT IS, FOR THOSE WHO'VE "STUDIED TO SHOW YOURSELF RIGHT/APPROVED" AND KNOW HOW TO PROVE AND USE "CONSTITUTIONAL JURYLESS/IN-SOLIDO COURTS' PROPER DEFAULT FUNCTION/LIMITS CORRECTLY", THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (TRUE GOVERNMENT) CANNOT BE MALFUNCTIONED.....The "Criminal Negligence" of an accused's failure/refusal to answer in 10 days, Sundays excepted (as Article 1, Section 7, Clauses 1-4 of the 1787 U.S. Constitution provided of such "1776 Declaration's" prohibitions of "mock trials that engage in the various forms of these Criminally-Negligent activities"), defaults [Civil and Criminal] included, has and shall remain a reprovable/scienific aspect of law (and facts)....HENCE, ITS ONLY ONE'S FAILURE/REFUSAL TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND "CONSTITUTIONAL DEFAULT" (I.E., THE FAILURE/REFUSAL TO LEARN WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, AND TO ACTUALLY USE IT) THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM..[NOT RACISM, SEXISM, OR HOMOPHOBIA, "AT ALL", UNLESS/UNTIL YOU TRY/SUPPORT/DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, DEFAULT SPECIFICLY, THEREBY, OBTAIN SUCH GRAND-JURY-DEFAULT-WARRANTS AND THEY/THOSE-ON-THE-TAX-PAID-PAYROLL, STILL REFUSE TO ENFORCE THE GRAND-JURY-WARRANTS-YOU'VE-OBTAINED-VIA-SUCH-CONSTITUTIONAL-SUPPORT&DEFENSE....ONLY THEN WOULD/SHALL IT BE "THEIR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE" INSTEAD IF YOURS, THATS THE PROBLEM (IN MAJOR PART, AT LEAST)...

Since anything less than the Tax/Frankpence-paid/due-process of a trial by jury to resolve any/all disputes that may occur, is a due-process-denying (tax and benefit stealing) act of "Void Judgment" (denying the Grand Juries their jurisdiction and authority over all crimes, via Criminal Negligence and WORSE)...THE FOUNDING FATHERS, AS THESE CONSTITUTIONAL GRAND JURY WARRANTS REPROVE, SINCE 1988-89'S LADC#89-00443; USDC#90-2482, ET.SEQ., ANNUALLY REFILED/INCLUDED TO DATE, CREATED A "TRUE GOVERNMENT", AN ORGANIZATION, LIKE NO OTHER, THAT PREVENTS CORRUPT JUDGES AND REPRESENTATIVES (AND THE BOGUS/PRETENDED-AUTHORITY SO-CALLED-LAWS THEY MAKE) FROM OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE...ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS FILE/PRESENT "WRITTEN DEMANDS" TO ACCUSEDS AND GRAND JURIES TO PROVE IT (AND SEE FOR YOURSELF)...

THOUGH NOT BEING ENFORCED, PROPERLY, ANYWHERE (DESPITE HAVING BEEN INCLUDED IN THE U.S CODE, SINCE THE "1970S RIVO AND ORGANIZED CRIME ACTS" RELATED REVISIONS IN 18USC1522, ETC.)....IT'SS THIS "MALFUNCTION FROM THE VERY BEGINNING/FIRST" THAT DELAYS JUSTICE, ASAP, IF NOT AVOIDING IT, uALTOGETHER.....THE CAUSE OF BOTH OUR TRUSTS AND BUDGET DEFICITS, AS WELL AS "PREVENTABLE FOREIGN/ENEMY LOANS", AND EPIDEMICS (as proven with Reagan in the 1980s, regarding the Social Security Trust, eliminating it's deficit for the first time (without any illegal benefit cuts/thefts...and proven regarding the COVID-19 EPIDEMIC, to date...where "proper grand jury function" delay/denial has caused Due-Benefits (antibiotics from the onset, to determine/prove MDRs, Multi-Drug-Residtant Infectants, and prevent secondary infections; as wel as the "Dead Virus/Antigen Oral Vaccines" that are the only "true cure/immunity/human-antibody producing" medicines....all others, as "Plant/Animal Vaccines" and "Commie Bioengineered-Virus Vaccines" only produce "Human Antibody Bioequivalents" (creating a looting ENDEMIC from an Epidemic, not a real cure, DEFINATELY, NOT THE REAL CURE WE'VE PAID TAXES TO PROVIDE AND ALL ALTERNATIVES ARE "FRAUDULENTLY/RACKETEERINGLY REPRESENTED", IN VIOLATION OF THE 1906 PURE FOOD AND DRUG ACT, TO FAIL/REFUSE TO iNFORM PATIENTS REGARDING....I.E., TO FAIL TO INFORM THEM THAT "THEY SHOULD AND COULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN "A REAL CURE", A "DEAD VIRUS/ANTIGEN ORAL VACCINE", BUT, WERE GIVEN "SOMETHING ELSE", INSTEAD....[Bioequivalents leaving patients prone to re-infection, prevented by the "Dead Virus/Antigen Oral Vaccine" Cure and, thusly, leaves patients vulnerable to "annual boosters or varriant vaccines", lootingly, as well, forever, if proper "Dead Virus/Antigen Oral Vaccines" are never taken, as due, from the first...

The Founding Fathers created the "OATH OF OFFICE" ("to support and defend the U. S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic") to make all government employees' duties, once a crime occurs, readily rerovable, beyond doubt, criminally...but, even without the Oath of Office, these duties are undeniable and reprovable...and can be summarized, basicly, as "take appropriate corrective/resolving action, asap...as to fail/refuse to do so is Criminally Negligent."

From the macrocosmicly and microcosmicly involved factors of the phenomena, history scientificly reproves that a "grand/trial jury" makes fewer mistakes regarding any/all aspects of "law/warrant making and enforcing" than any other known structure "ever known/tried".... juryless structures (Kings and Judges), poisons (trials by ordeal), combat (trials by battle), dice/bone rollings (trials by chance) etc...and, hence, it's reprovably criminal negligence to fail/refuse to provide this "least of error making form of justice/resolution providing process", whenever a crime occurs (and/or someone is accused of a crime)... Fortunately, for Modern Day Americans, paper and horses existed from the onset of the country, PERVASIVELY.....so, while the "1814 Burning of DC", destroyed the Library of Congress and enough of the "Federal Records" to have the "proper function of a juryless, in-soludo, court" virtually "ELIMINATED FROM THE RECORD", Federally, it did remain in the various "POLICE COMMISSIONER TRAFFIC COURTS" across the country....although variously distorted, put before any grand/trial jury in the country, it's still reprovable, beyond doubt, just exactly what these "Consitutional Juryless, In-Solido Courts" limitations and duties truly are....THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE "REPROVABLE PROPER JURYLESS, IN-SOLIDO COURT FUNCTIONS" AND WHAT'S CURRENTLY OCCURRING, BEING THE 1980S-PROVEN-CAUSES OF OUR DEFICITS, OUR EXAGGERATED INJURY/ILLNESS PROLONGATIONS FROM THE ILLEGAL DENIALS OF DUE BENEFITS, OUR EXAGGERATED HEALTHCARE AND LEGAL COSTS, OUR EXAGGERATIONS IN EPIDEMIC PREVENTIONS, PUBLIC HEALTH-WISE (I.E., DELAYS IN MDR, MULTI-DRUG-RESISTANT INFECTENTS, BEING PROVEN/DISPROVEN/ISOLATED/INCUBATED/AND CONVERTED INTO "DEAD VIRUS/ANTIGEN ORAL VACCINES"...AS STILL HASN'T OCCURRED REGARDING COVID-19); AND EVERY VARIETY OF PERCEIVED "SYSTEMIC MALFUNCTION" KNOWN (GENDER RACE, SEXUALITY, RELIGION, AND OTHERWISE)....Biases that're all blamed for our communities' and nation's problems, but, which are really just the "WAR RHETORIC OF UTILITARIANISM/COMMUNiSM", PREVENTING THE NEEDED CORRECTIVES FROM EVER BEING ACHIEVED (I.E., WHERE THE "PROBLEMS" ARE NOT REPRESENTED AS A RESULT OF ADULT CITIZENS' FAILURE/REFUSAL TO PROPERLY SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE U.S.CONSTITUTION, PROPER JURYLESS, IN-SOLIDO COURT FUNCTION, PRIMARILY, FIRST AND FOREMOST)...Resultantly, as "Marx's Newspaper Vs. Franklin's" exemplified, only a net-worsening of conditions can result, where the "only solution of properly functioning government" is not the primary focus, and the "only correct summation" of the problem(s).

Where "Proper Juryless and In-Solido Court Function" is concerned, we must look to "Article 1, Section 7, Clauses 1-4 of the 1787 U. S. Constitution" to first-find the"Constitutional Applications of Default" (Civil and/or Criminal; Civil Default also being seen in "California Civil Form 100", as well as the 1948-Title-22:975, and the Federal Code of Civil Proceedure#55, etc.).....and, coupled with the "1804-05 U.S. Organic Acts" ("In-Solido Courts") and various "Police Commissioner Traffic Courts" (and even pre-1814 precedents) across the country (where there are no "Judges", just a Commissioner, studied in the law; and, where, basicly, said "Commissioner" is prohibited from, "doing anything" other than "after a ticket has been issued to an accused" and said "accused" has "FAILED OR REFUSED TO PREPONDERABLY-ANSWER; PAY; OR COMPLY WITH THE TICKET OR DEMAND")...called a "Default"..[and, just as the U. S. Constitution details, above, A1S7C1-4, wherein "a Majority-Ruling of the Congress/General-Court BECOMES A LAW/"ENFORCEABLE-WARRANT" (WITHOUT A BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING FIRST OCCURRING THEREUPON), upon the President failing/refusing to attend to it in 10 days, Sundays excepted", we see the CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION OF DEFAULT (CIVIL AND/OR CRIMINAL)...As, similarly, later Federally Statutized in not only the "U.S. Organic Acts', 1804-05, etc., but, the "U.S. ACT OF 1857"...

As Jurisprudence teaches us, in general, merely "preponderable- verdicts" of grand/trial juries by a majority or more, are limited to "above bankruptcy properties" of the defendant, in compensation, and, therefore, require a bankruptcy proceeding, before being enforced. Whereas, UNANIMOUS AND BEYOND DOUBT VERDICTS OF A GRAND/TRIAL JURY ALLOW "BELOW BANKRUPTCY PROPERTIES TO BE SEARCHED AND/OR SEIZED IN FURTHERANCE OF SUCH CONVICTIONS" (PERSONS INCLUDED)..It's the "actual making" of these tax/Frankpence-paid/due-processes, when due, that the Founding Fathers prohibited the denial of, in 1776, defining this Civil and Criminal Negligence, further, in the 1787 U. S. Constitution, and Statutized the matter further in the "U. S. Organic Acts" and the "1857 Default Act". Thusly, its readily reprovable, as well, that upon an accused being presented with a "written demand" (for that which is lawfully-due, monetarily or otherwise), the failure/refusal to similarly present the matter to the grand/trial jury, prevents a unanimous, beyond doubt, grand/trial jury verdict from being achieved (via vote or default), but, does still result in a CIVIL DEFAULT, upon the ACCUSED'S failure/refusal to preponderably-answer/pay/comply (as 1948-Title-22:975" provides); whereas, if both the ACCUSED AND GRAND JURY ARE PRESENTED WITH SUCH A WRITTEN DEMAND, THEN, THE ACCUSED'S FAILURE/REFUSAL TO PREPONDERABLY-ANSWER/PAY/COMPLY WILL, BEYOND DOUBT, RESULT IN A CRIMINAL DEFAULT (EITHER VIA VOTE OR DEFAULT OF THE GRAND/TRIAL JURY), IF/WHEN PREPONDERABLY-UNANSWERED/UNPAID/UNCOMPLIED-WITH....IN 10 DAYS, SUNDAYS EXCEPTED (OFTEN STATUTIZED IR CODIFIED AS "15 DAYS MAXIMUM").....AND WARRANTS FOR SEARCH/SEIZURE OF BELOW BANKRUPTCY PROPERTIES WILL BE DUE ("AUTOMATICLY ISSUE" OR SHOULD HAVE) IN 10 DAYS, SUNDAYS EXCEPTED...

It's, relatedly, reprovable and undeniable, that this "GRAND JURY AND ACCUSED PRESENTED WRITTEN DEMAND"THAT RESULTS IN A CRIMINAL DEFAULT IF/WHEN PREPONDEEABLY-UNANSWERED, UNPAID, UNCOMPLIED-WITH BY THE ACCUSED IN 10 DAYS, SUNDAYS EXCEPTED" details a Tax-Paid/Due-Process of law enforcement and that Criminal Negligence has occurred whenever a citizen/owner has made such "grand jury and accused presented, written demand" and the accused has failed/refused to preinderably-answer, pay, comply in 10 days, Sundays excepted, without the grand jury issuing DEFAULT WARRANTS FOR SEARCH AND/OR SEIZURE OF SUCH A CRIMINALLY-DEFAULTING-ACCUSED (FOR DEFAULTIVE "CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE", MINIMALLY)...AND/OR ANY/ALL OF THEIR PROPERTIES TO PAY ANYSUCH WARRANTED AMOUNTS...

While these Scientific/Grand-Jury-Reprovable "Constitutional Default Provisions" do reprove that any accused who fails/refuses to preponderably-answer/pay/comply-with a written-demand, presented to the accused and an "arbitration court" (for a Civil DEFAULT) or presented to the accused and the grand/trial jury (for Criminal Default), in 10 days, Sundays excepted, has engaged in the Criminal Negligence of Default (Civil or Criminal, as the case may be).....AND ANY ATTEMPTS OF DISMISSAL ARE "CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT VOID JUDGMENTS" (AND WORSE), ONCE/AFTER A DEFAULT HAS OCCURRED..It's certain that the proper use of these U. S. Constitution Supporting and Defending "Default Provisions" (over current "Lawyer-Planter Processes" of discovery, etc., First) are certain to eliminate some 60%+ of error, as well as exaggerated Court costs and justice-delays...proving it's criminally negligent not to correct such "current functions"...